RE:View Aliens Part I

Aliens is my favorite Eighties blast-flick, even nudging out Predator.  For whatever reason, this is the one that speaks to me.

What James Cameron got right was basically everything. It was massively influential in 1980s science fiction pop-culture. Aliens created an entire aesthetic template for the Space Marine that everyone who followed Cameron had to either consciously accept or reject. The Colonial Marines were up there with Starfleet. And Aliens setup a film that would hold the title of “most disappointing sequel of all time” for the next 25 years.

Also, there is no way that this film could be made today.  

That tells you right there it’s quality.

The funny thing about Aliens is that it does work as a sequel.  It feels like it’s the next part of a story that is being told.  Which is odd because the first movie has almost no resemblance to the second.

Ridley Scott’s 1979 feature, Alien, was a horror movie.  It was a haunted house story that hit all of that genre’s tropes, but it was set in space, so you couldn’t jump out of a window and run off into the night. The crew was stuck in thier frieghter with IT.  The thing that made Alien work is that it looked like an American blue-collar working factory.  Before Star Wars, the future was always bright, clean, and very white like in 2001. Alien followed the grubby aesthetic which made it easier for the audience to identify with the crew once the horror started.

And it was true horror.  There was a massive power imbalance between the Xenomorph and the doomed crew of the Nostromo. They were utterly helpless and the Thing in the Dark was going to get them no matter what they did.  The only question was how soon would it do it?  That is the essence of straight horror. 

Aliens is the much trickier military-horror. First of all, the troops have to smell right. The Marines have to feel like they are the products of military culture.  That is usually the biggest stumbling block for any filmmaker with no experience in the military.  

The basic problem is that they wrap up a few tropes and clichés from other war movies without any of the driving passion of personal experience that would give their characters a bit of depth. The end result is something that feels a lot more like a biker gang than a military organization.  When these moives do fail, nine times out of ten you will detect a Gamma resentment of burly, masculine men shining through the filmmaker’s work. 

And I admit there was plenty Cameron got wrong about military culture. Particularly the “make your own uniforms” thing.  Truth be said, there is some precedent for that in Vietnam and the Pacific Theater in WWII.  Although, that is a situation where you are talking about long term combat and your issued uniform is pretty much shredded up rags anyway.   These guys were fresh out of garrison and they looked like ass.  However, Cameron’s strength has always been in visual representations to tell stories and with as much economy as possible.  To do that he has to work with visual tropes and stereotypes that the audience is already familiar with and in 1986 Vietnam was still a pretty fresh memory.

Regardless, when all is said and done, the Colonial Marines felt like a line unit to me.  I was a career Marine and to me they had the correct smell.

So, Cameron got the first part of military horror right which is the military.  The other element of military horror is that you can’t turn your troops into the Kids from Crystal Lake or to be more exact, make them another Crew of the Nostromo.  That kind of power imbalance won’t work in military-horror. A military organization is going to have discipline, training, teamwork, and resources. The first time the Thing in the Dark, comes out of the dark, it gets its teeth kicked in.

For military-horror to work you have to finesse your doomed troops’ situation.  More on that in a moment.

Aliens had a pretty good start.  The escape capsule containing the sole survivor of the Nostromo is found decades after the ship’s destruction. Ripley gets blamed by the company and during her vilification session she is informed that there is now a colony on the planet where she found Egg of Evil.

Then the colony goes radio silent.

A 1980s mergers and acquisitions executive shows-up at Ripley’s apartment to talk her into going on an expedition to look in on the colony.

I admit this part is a little inconsistent.  Either Weyland-Yutani knew what was going on at the colony or they didn’t.  What was going on at the colony clearly rated a full-size Marine Expeditionary Unit instead of one understrength platoon (honestly this was rifle squad, not a platoon) with a butter-bars Second Lieutenant commanding. However, a full-strength MEU could have handled the problem, which would have made for a dull story.

The Sulaco arrives and they take a quick look around the colony.  Nobody home and there have clearly been signs of a struggle. When they look over the med facility they find a “face-hugger,” under glass.  The Marines discover that all of the Colonists’ personal transponders are transmitting from inside the powerplant, so they go have a look.  Then the aliens ambush them.

In military-horror, one of the ways that you finesse troops’ situation into a doomed one is to limit their resources. Which Cameron did effectively, by destroying most of their supplies as well as their way to signal the Sulaco that they were in trouble. They could hold their own so long as they had ammo but they didn’t have enough of that to survive. He was also clever about creating a leadership vacuum.  

A working relationship between a newly minted officer and a career platoon sergeant is one that happens in the real world.  Ideally, the platoon will have a parental model, the new officer being a young, flustered but well-meaning Dad. The Sergeant being the Mom who insists that the Dad is the master of the house and that his very word is law, but the kids all know who really wears the pants in the family.  Now consider that dynamic if Mom is eaten by a Grue.

Then the 2nd Lt. is injured and now there is a leadership vacuum that Ripley will have to step into.  This is supposed to be Corporal Hicks but American military tradition is to submit to civilian authority, so when Ripley starts leading, it works.

When I said this film couldn’t be made today, I meant it.  Third-wave feminism could not tolerate the character of Ellen Ripley.  In a modern iteration she would be the one in charge from the start constantly getting in everyone’s face and being right all the time.  And of course, everyone who she met would love her for it because she’s so beautiful and fierce all the time.  In fact the image of Ripley has been changed by the perception of her character in this film.  The pop-culture view of the character is that she is an action hero born to kick Xeno-ass.

But Ripley was scared to death when she agreed to come on the mission.  She had never wanted to leave Earth again, she only did so get her license back.  She was entirely reactive until the ambush.  What made her character work was her relationship with Newt.  A maternal relationship as a driving force is nothing short of horror to modern feminists.  Yet, when Newt was captured, Ripley’s reaction was believable, she went full mama bear and she was getting her cub back or she’d die trying and she didn’t care if the world burned so long her little girl was in danger.

The juxtaposed standoff between human mother and alien mother was a perfect climax to the film.

When the movie was over, we all wanted more.  Be careful what you wish for.  Alien 3 undid the entire ending of Aliens during the opening credits. I have never hated a movie more until I saw The Last Jedi.

Aliens was a film that should have started a franchise but the elements that made its fans want more were completely missed by any of the films that followed it.  It remains a one-off.

At least in the movies.  It has lived on in numerous books, comics and video games. 

However, I can’t say that it’s future is bright.

Aliens is now the property of Disney Entertainment.

End of Part I

Okay, I’m done here.

12 thoughts on “RE:View Aliens Part I

  1. I listened to an audio version of the William Gibson script for the third Alien movie. It had a lot of weak points, but wasn’t bad. Also, it didn’t kill off Hicks and Newt. It had a conclusion that left the door open for more films.

    I love Aliens.


  2. Great review! I always thought of this as an action movie and not a horror one, but the great thing about this flick is that it works as both.

    This is also one of the few non-Star Wars movies where the original cut is superior to the director’s cut, and that’s entirely due to the scene with Newt and her parents finding the ship. It’s neat to see a day in the life of the colony and then find out where patient zero came from, but it totally ruins both the unsettling “nobody’s home” atmosphere and the shock of finding the facehuggers in the medlab. It does make things more disturbing though, since it puts faces (children included) to a chunk of the 157 people who ended up cocooned and impregnated.

    They totally should have kept the part where Ripley found out her actual daughter lived her whole life and died of old age while she was in cryosleep, as it adds critical context for why she went all mama bear for Newt. Cutting that was as bad as cutting the scene in Independence Day where Goldblum explains to Spiner how he could hack an alien ship with his laptop.

    I also think it’s obvious from Burke’s objection to nuking the site from orbit and dissembling when Ripley calls him out that he, and by extension the company, knew damn well what was going to happen if he sent them to that ship. I mean I guess it’s possible that he had no idea and was just following orders from the higher-ups, but it sure doesn’t seem that way and I always felt he was trying to CYA when he said that. To me it was implied (but not explicitly stated) that the entire point of setting up a colony on that planet in particular was to get the aliens for the bio-weapons division, just like how the Nostromo was re-routed.


      1. It’s called the “special edition” and I think it’s included in most of the recent DVD and Blu-ray releases. It was like the second DVD I ever bought circa 1999, which is how I found out about it.

        Most of the new scenes don’t add much, except for the one with Ripley‘s daughter. The parts with the sentry guns are fun, though.


  3. I’ve always thought Burke was one of the best screen villains ever. Most people at one time or another have worked with a lying scum bag who can pretend their genuine, only to screw you over later. Paul Reiser deserved an award for that performance.

    “It was a bad call. I made a bad call.”


    1. You’re right he did a great job. Somehow he managed to have a career beyond that. I did enjoy that Stranger Things had his character play against what you expected.


  4. Excellent review on all counts.

    I’ve got to make one criticism of an otherwise perfect movie – and it’s a mark of how good Aliens is that it honestly never occurred to me until I re-watched it several years ago.

    The space jockey ship.

    What happened to it?

    As far as I could tell, the space jockey ship never plays into the story except they mention that’s where they found the eggs.

    The more I think of it, the more of a plot-hole that becomes: why would the company be bothering with the aliens at all? Why obsess about some likely unreliable potential bioweapons when there’s a whole crashed space ship full of advanced alien tech that may well be superior to Earth’s? That’s what the company should have been after all along.


    1. The corporate logic in both movies was always a weak point. Of course, seeing the stupid decisions people make in real life, it isn’t beyond the realm of possibility W-Y suits keep doing the same dumb thing.


  5. It’s too bad movies have to be around 2 hours in order to sell. I would love to see the 45 minute adaptation of “Aliens: We Sent A Battalion”.


  6. Media Zealot had a good takedown of the Weyland Yutani group and why everything it did was kind of stupid:

    I believe the official line on Burke (and why he sent such a small force of Marines to the colony) is that he wanted to keep the Aliens secret from the higher ups. Weyland-Yutani is a big corporate bureaucracy with different, self-interested factions, each grabbing for as much power as they can. So it makes sense that Burke would do something stupid, like send a too small force with an inexperienced leader, in the hope that it would give him more personal control over the situation. It was a risk, but if it had paid off for Burke, he would have been one of the richest men in the galaxy.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s